ACEs in the news: How can advocates communicate more effectively about childhood trauma?

printer friendlyprinter friendly

In the 1990s, researchers at the CDC and Kaiser Permanente conducted a pivotal study, which showed that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) — stressful or traumatic events, such as abuse, divorce and neglect — are linked to a wide array of poor mental and physical health outcomes that persist well into adulthood. The more ACEs someone experienced as a child, the higher their risk for conditions like diabetes, cancer, substance abuse or suicide. The ACEs study introduced a groundbreaking new framework for understanding how children's early experiences affect their health as adults, with profound implications for every sector in our society — especially those dealing directly with children and youth.

Issue 24 report coverHowever, communicating about ACEs can be challenging, even for members of the public health community who are familiar with the lifelong impact of trauma. So how can we help the public and policymakers understand the importance of this issue?

At Berkeley Media Studies Group, we know that the way an issue is framed in the news shapes our view both of the problem and of potential solutions. One step toward developing more effective strategies to communicate about ACEs is to find out how they appear in the news. BMSG's latest Issue examines media coverage of childhood trauma to see how advocates, community leaders and journalists are communicating about ACEs and how they can be prevented.

In our news analysis, we found that:

  • Coverage of ACEs has increased dramatically since 2008, but the overall volume of coverage has remained relatively modest even at its highest.
  • The coverage is solutions-focused, but prevention is overshadowed by after-the-fact interventions.
  • Speakers from the health care sector are well-represented, but representations from other sectors are missing.
  • Issues of health equity are scarce in the discussion of ACEs.

Types of adverse childhood experiences in U.S. news, 2008-2015 (n=172)

Table 4: Types of ACEs in U.S. news

With this information, we can shape the way that communities and policymakers view childhood trauma and how to end it by thinking strategically about opportunities and potential pitfalls in this rising tide of coverage.

Our news analysis shows us that child health and welfare advocates have successfully advanced the conversation about ACEs with a focus on solutions. To build on this progress, we offer the following recommendations for advocates:

1. Make prevention part of the conversation

To do this well, be clear about what prevention looks like. Help the public visualize the different ways communities can prevent childhood trauma by providing specific, detailed examples.

For example, in this article from Memphis, Tennessee, advocates spoke about their newly launched Universal Parenting Places — "judgement-free" family resource centers where parents can access professional counseling, information and emotional support. In a follow-up opinion piece, the advocates wrote, "The centers are open at no cost to every family regardless of education, race, income or neighborhood, because we know that parenting challenges are universal."

By painting the picture of prevention, advocates not only combat the idea that childhood trauma is overwhelming and intractable, but they also provide blueprints for others to do prevention work in their own communities.

2. Build capacity among leaders from a range of sectors to talk effectively about ACEs

As the old adage goes, "It takes a village to raise a child." It's vital to recruit people from different sectors to comprehensively prevent childhood trauma. However, even though schools and local businesses play such an important role in child development and community health, the news rarely quotes stakeholders from the education and business sectors.

Enlist more people from different fields and give them the capacity to talk about ACEs from their perspectives: Build coalitions of leaders from different sectors, develop a shared vision for advocacy and provide media advocacy training so that they can speak about childhood trauma effectively.

For example, the Trauma Smart program developed by the Crittenton Children's Center in Kansas City trains parents, caregivers, teachers and staff about ACEs and childhood trauma. In this article, an assistant principal is quoted about the effectiveness and importance of trauma-informed instruction in helping kids: "Every school should have this. … Teachers are seeing results."

The more teachers, school administrators, business owners and community members who are aware of ACEs and can talk about solutions, the more people who can raise the profile of ACEs as a critical and preventable issue for the entire community.

3. Talk about race and equity issues and the community context of childhood trauma

We know that racism, poverty, community violence and other structural inequities are inextricably linked with childhood trauma. Central to making prevention visible is talking about the communities in which trauma happens. However, the news rarely makes connections between childhood trauma and structural inequities.

Help reporters use their storytelling to show how dismantling racism and structural inequities and transforming systems and structures play a role in preventing childhood trauma. Offer information and data about the local community, larger patterns of childhood trauma, relevant policies and institutional players, and what is being done to address the issue. By talking about race and equity issues that contribute to childhood trauma, advocates can help elevate the connections between preventing trauma and other social and political movements to advance progress on multiple fronts.

For example, in this article, advocate and Bureau of Indian Affairs victim specialist Wendy Bremner talks about the historical oppression of the Blackfeet people. She outlines how structural inequities contribute to the high levels of childhood trauma in their Native American community to this day, as well as how cultural factors help the community band together in spite of these challenges. The article also discusses Bremner's work and federal legislation aimed at helping tribes promote public safety. She notes, "Our community is just awesome for outpourings of generosity, even though they're struggling themselves. We're working toward healing. We're starting to get there."

Conversations like this one that talk about race and structural inequity but also talk about hope help shift the focus to the broader social change needed to create and maintain truly trauma-informed and trauma-free communities.

community members painting a mural

To learn more about the findings from our news analysis and read our complete set of recommendations, including those for journalists, you can access Issue 24 in our publications library.


california (1) new year's resolutions (1) autism (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) democracy (1) advocacy (3) junk food marketing (4) soda (12) Marion Nestle (1) race (1) community safety (1) filibuster (1) violence (2) gun violence (1) measure N (2) FCC (1) target marketing (9) San Francisco (3) Sandy Hook (2) racism (1) suicide prevention (2) alcohol (5) Happy Meals (1) breastfeeding (3) cancer prevention (1) beverage industry (2) food (1) liana winett (1) youth (1) vaccines (1) healthy eating (1) food access (1) corporate social responsibility (1) strategic communication (1) SSBs (1) community health (1) chronic disease (2) world water day (1) news analysis (3) political correctness (1) journalism (1) cervical cancer (1) privilege (1) Black Lives Matter (1) ssb (1) Richmond (5) childhood lead poisoning (1) Newtown (1) online marketing (1) Michelle Obama (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) communication (2) adverse childhood experiences (3) sexual violence (2) equity (3) weight of the nation (1) auto safety (1) cosmetics (1) obesity (10) Big Soda (2) community organizing (1) childhood trauma (3) naacp (1) cannes lions festival (1) Donald Trump (2) choice (1) media analysis (6) stigma (1) Citizens United (1) Big Tobacco (3) communication strategy (1) diabetes (1) food and beverage marketing (3) health equity (10) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) tobacco tax (1) gatorade bolt game (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) childhood obesity (1) prison system (1) genital warts (1) Proposition 47 (1) obesity prevention (1) sexism (2) Texas (1) Oglala Sioux (3) media (7) government intrusion (1) Nickelodeon (1) social math (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) public health (71) authentic voices (1) gun control (2) industry appeals to choice (1) food justice (1) sandusky (2) social change (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) social justice (2) diabetes prevention (1) Aurora (1) Bill Cosby (1) health care (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) children's health (3) digital marketing (3) default frame (1) seat belt laws (1) paula deen (1) SB 1000 (1) reproductive justice (1) Wendy Davis (1) built environment (2) Colorado (1) McDonald's (1) structural racism (1) Telluride (1) women's health (2) Connecticut shooting (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) snap (1) news monitoring (1) news strategy (1) gender (1) El Monte (3) food deserts (1) george lakoff (1) white house (1) abortion (1) sports drinks (1) marketing (1) institutional accountability (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) nanny state (2) food swamps (1) public health data (1) Measure O (1) Proposition 29 (1) public health policy (2) junk food (2) prison phone calls (1) food marketing (5) Catholic church (1) violence prevention (8) Let's Move (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) SB 402 (1) Joe Paterno (1) ACEs (2) Merck (1) suicide nets (1) food industry (4) beauty products (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Dora the Explorer (1) education (1) sexual health (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) front groups (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) tobacco control (2) tobacco industry (2) framing (14) Chile (1) social media (2) campaign finance (1) suicide barrier (2) news coverage (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) language (6) Tea Party (1) product safety (1) soda warning labels (1) American Beverage Association (1) regulation (2) elephant triggers (1) water security (1) media bites (1) Coca-Cola (3) Bloomberg (3) Gardasil (1) summer camps (1) media advocacy (23) environmental health (1) community violence (1) SB-5 (1) election 2016 (1) cap the tap (1) soda taxes (2) soda industry (4) values (1) child sexual abuse (5) tobacco (5) Penn State (3) Twitter (1) Berkeley (2) childhood adversity (1) mental health (2) nonprofit communications (1) Amanda Fallin (1) inequities (1) Whiteclay (4) community (1) Big Food (2) food environment (1) messaging (3) HPV vaccine (1) prevention (1) water (1) Sam Kass (1) news (2) cigarette advertising (1) sanitation (1) PepsiCo (1) sexual assault (1) sugary drinks (10) collaboration (1) cancer research (1) personal responsibility (3) physical activity (1) paper tigers (1) Rachel Grana (1) indoor smoking ban (1) emergency contraception (1) apha (3) soda tax (11) safety (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: