Big Food and Big Tobacco take the long view and so should advocates

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Earlier this month, I tuned into the webcast of the UCSF "It's About a Billion Lives" annual symposium to hear the latest from the tobacco control field. Even though I've heard amazing presentations by UCSF's scientists many times, I was riveted by what scholars Amanda Fallin & Rachel Grana had to say about the role of the tobacco industry in fomenting the Tea Party.

I've read stories before saying the Tea Party isn't the grassroots movement it claims. One of the more prominent involved the Tea Party Express, a bus tour meant to drum up Tea Party support. Led by a Sacramento-based lobbying group, it was widely criticized -- by many within the Tea Party as well as outsiders -- as nothing more than "astroturf," made to seem like grassroots activism but funded and supported by major corporations or wealthy donors. The infamous David Koch, of the Koch brothers, has been called the Tea Party's "wallet" for backing a variety of conservative causes around the country.

But I was blown away by what Fallin and Grana found in the tobacco industry documents. As early as the 1980s, the tobacco industry began working on a way to position smoking as a right that must be protected against governmental intrusion and foresaw how a national movement could support this campaign. In 1993, a PR consultant for Philip Morris offered an eerily prescient recommendation for what this campaign should entail:

"Grounded in the theme of 'The New American Tax Revolution' or 'The New Boston Tea Party,' the campaign should take the form of citizens representing the widest constituency base mobilized with signage and other attention-drawing accoutrements such as lapel buttons, handouts, petitions and even costumes."

Sound familiar?

The authors go on to detail the many ways in which the tobacco industry has been involved in fomenting the Tea Party, including being a "quarterback behind the scenes," and supporting "third-party efforts," such as Citizens for a Sound Economy, an organization founded in 1984 by the Koch brothers that has spawned various Tea Party groups still active today.

No surprise then that the paper (payment required for non-subscribers), has spurred quite a bit of media attention, including some notable pushback. Fox News' spin on the story offers a criticism right out of the tobacco-Tea Party playbook. Fox calls the research "an attractive narrative for Tea Party critics," quoting a Tea Party Patriot co-founder saying, "It's an example of the frivolous spending inside the government that has landed us $17 trillion in debt" -- a critique that echoes criticism of government found in the tobacco industry documents. Most news coverage, however, has shared my shock at how long ago the tobacco industry began its deep involvement with this cause.

Corporate influence in politics is not merely about the Tea Party but about how corporations can undermine effective actions to create a healthier society. For example, right now the FDA's lack of meaningful action on tobacco products is calling into question whether the agency is a public health ally in the fight against the damage caused by the industry's products.

And this issue isn't just limited to Big Tobacco. An abundance of recent evidence points to the food & beverage and alcohol industries using many of these same tactics -- such as strategic donations to public health and civil rights organizations, and stalling governmental action -- to similar effect.

As I listened to Fallin and Grana describe Big Tobacco's Tea Party exploits, it reminded me how good the industry is at playing the long game -- it is able to see potential threats coming well before they manifest, and it is excellent at planning counter strategies. We found that soda companies are up to the same thing when they use corporate social responsibility campaigns to market themselves as part of the solution to obesity. Pepsi, for example, figured out that young people attach major significance to brands perceived to "do good" in the world and used its Refresh Everything campaign as a means to create long-lasting brand loyalties with these consumers.

Whether it's junk foods, alcohol or tobacco, industry has shown time and again that it plans far in advance. Those committed to improving health need to remember this and be ready for a sustained effort to change harmful corporate practices and achieve our health goals.


adverse childhood experiences (3) food deserts (1) Texas (1) Bloomberg (3) sugary drinks (10) collaboration (1) Sam Kass (1) sexism (2) physical activity (1) political correctness (1) language (6) cancer prevention (1) Twitter (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Richmond (5) new year's resolutions (1) digital marketing (2) gun violence (1) SB 1000 (1) messaging (3) SSBs (1) child sexual abuse (5) corporate social responsibility (1) violence prevention (8) democracy (1) government intrusion (1) soda industry (4) paper tigers (1) suicide prevention (2) george lakoff (1) San Francisco (3) childhood lead poisoning (1) obesity (10) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) inequities (1) autism (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) marketing (1) measure N (2) Michelle Obama (1) campaign finance (1) world water day (1) cancer research (1) food and beverage marketing (3) junk food marketing to kids (2) education (1) community safety (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) elephant triggers (1) prevention (1) Chile (1) food industry (4) beverage industry (2) Newtown (1) Wendy Davis (1) youth (1) cigarette advertising (1) sexual health (1) Merck (1) public health (70) front groups (1) Proposition 29 (1) Marion Nestle (1) liana winett (1) food environment (1) reproductive justice (1) health equity (10) cannes lions festival (1) communication strategy (1) authentic voices (1) water security (1) Let's Move (1) emergency contraception (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) PepsiCo (1) paula deen (1) food justice (1) sports drinks (1) seat belt laws (1) soda (12) Big Tobacco (3) summer camps (1) genital warts (1) online marketing (1) Amanda Fallin (1) snap (1) ACEs (2) media (7) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) institutional accountability (1) childhood trauma (3) Jerry Sandusky (3) alcohol (5) SB-5 (1) election 2016 (1) gender (1) naacp (1) mental health (2) Tea Party (1) FCC (1) tobacco (5) chronic disease (2) vaccines (1) cap the tap (1) journalism (1) Measure O (1) racism (1) news (2) HPV vaccine (1) apha (3) sexual assault (1) water (1) tobacco tax (1) nanny state (2) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) environmental health (1) social media (2) nonprofit communications (1) Black Lives Matter (1) strategic communication (1) food access (1) healthy eating (1) personal responsibility (3) regulation (2) media analysis (6) El Monte (3) california (1) children's health (3) weight of the nation (1) social change (1) Big Soda (2) Joe Paterno (1) Colorado (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) gun control (2) indoor smoking ban (1) Catholic church (1) Coca-Cola (3) abortion (1) diabetes prevention (1) Donald Trump (2) suicide barrier (2) Twitter for advocacy (1) suicide nets (1) news monitoring (1) structural racism (1) media bites (1) social math (1) Oglala Sioux (3) American Beverage Association (1) food (1) community violence (1) media advocacy (23) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) food swamps (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Aurora (1) framing (14) social justice (2) sandusky (2) Bill Cosby (1) news analysis (3) news strategy (1) prison phone calls (1) McDonald's (1) soda warning labels (1) junk food (2) women's health (2) advocacy (3) sexual violence (2) race (1) Sandy Hook (2) tobacco control (2) tobacco industry (2) default frame (1) SB 402 (1) Whiteclay (4) safety (1) public health data (1) choice (1) gatorade bolt game (1) Telluride (1) diabetes (1) Connecticut shooting (1) childhood obesity (1) cosmetics (1) product safety (1) cervical cancer (1) Nickelodeon (1) public health policy (2) Big Food (2) Happy Meals (1) privilege (1) industry appeals to choice (1) Proposition 47 (1) Penn State (3) values (1) communication (2) community health (1) Rachel Grana (1) soda taxes (2) violence (2) equity (3) Citizens United (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) beauty products (1) food marketing (4) obesity prevention (1) soda tax (11) prison system (1) filibuster (1) target marketing (8) junk food marketing (4) white house (1) community (1) auto safety (1) stigma (1) Berkeley (2) community organizing (1) ssb (1) breastfeeding (3) news coverage (1) childhood adversity (1) sanitation (1) built environment (2) health care (1) Gardasil (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: