Big Food and Big Tobacco take the long view and so should advocates

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Earlier this month, I tuned into the webcast of the UCSF "It's About a Billion Lives" annual symposium to hear the latest from the tobacco control field. Even though I've heard amazing presentations by UCSF's scientists many times, I was riveted by what scholars Amanda Fallin & Rachel Grana had to say about the role of the tobacco industry in fomenting the Tea Party.

I've read stories before saying the Tea Party isn't the grassroots movement it claims. One of the more prominent involved the Tea Party Express, a bus tour meant to drum up Tea Party support. Led by a Sacramento-based lobbying group, it was widely criticized -- by many within the Tea Party as well as outsiders -- as nothing more than "astroturf," made to seem like grassroots activism but funded and supported by major corporations or wealthy donors. The infamous David Koch, of the Koch brothers, has been called the Tea Party's "wallet" for backing a variety of conservative causes around the country.

But I was blown away by what Fallin and Grana found in the tobacco industry documents. As early as the 1980s, the tobacco industry began working on a way to position smoking as a right that must be protected against governmental intrusion and foresaw how a national movement could support this campaign. In 1993, a PR consultant for Philip Morris offered an eerily prescient recommendation for what this campaign should entail:

"Grounded in the theme of 'The New American Tax Revolution' or 'The New Boston Tea Party,' the campaign should take the form of citizens representing the widest constituency base mobilized with signage and other attention-drawing accoutrements such as lapel buttons, handouts, petitions and even costumes."

Sound familiar?

The authors go on to detail the many ways in which the tobacco industry has been involved in fomenting the Tea Party, including being a "quarterback behind the scenes," and supporting "third-party efforts," such as Citizens for a Sound Economy, an organization founded in 1984 by the Koch brothers that has spawned various Tea Party groups still active today.

No surprise then that the paper (payment required for non-subscribers), has spurred quite a bit of media attention, including some notable pushback. Fox News' spin on the story offers a criticism right out of the tobacco-Tea Party playbook. Fox calls the research "an attractive narrative for Tea Party critics," quoting a Tea Party Patriot co-founder saying, "It's an example of the frivolous spending inside the government that has landed us $17 trillion in debt" -- a critique that echoes criticism of government found in the tobacco industry documents. Most news coverage, however, has shared my shock at how long ago the tobacco industry began its deep involvement with this cause.

Corporate influence in politics is not merely about the Tea Party but about how corporations can undermine effective actions to create a healthier society. For example, right now the FDA's lack of meaningful action on tobacco products is calling into question whether the agency is a public health ally in the fight against the damage caused by the industry's products.

And this issue isn't just limited to Big Tobacco. An abundance of recent evidence points to the food & beverage and alcohol industries using many of these same tactics -- such as strategic donations to public health and civil rights organizations, and stalling governmental action -- to similar effect.

As I listened to Fallin and Grana describe Big Tobacco's Tea Party exploits, it reminded me how good the industry is at playing the long game -- it is able to see potential threats coming well before they manifest, and it is excellent at planning counter strategies. We found that soda companies are up to the same thing when they use corporate social responsibility campaigns to market themselves as part of the solution to obesity. Pepsi, for example, figured out that young people attach major significance to brands perceived to "do good" in the world and used its Refresh Everything campaign as a means to create long-lasting brand loyalties with these consumers.

Whether it's junk foods, alcohol or tobacco, industry has shown time and again that it plans far in advance. Those committed to improving health need to remember this and be ready for a sustained effort to change harmful corporate practices and achieve our health goals.


beauty products (1) media advocacy (23) sports drinks (1) food deserts (1) values (1) sugary drinks (10) Coca-Cola (3) Measure O (1) McDonald's (1) racism (1) public health (71) tobacco control (2) American Beverage Association (1) paula deen (1) reproductive justice (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) breastfeeding (3) sexism (2) childhood trauma (3) safety (1) suicide barrier (2) environmental health (1) Sam Kass (1) genital warts (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Big Food (2) emergency contraception (1) PepsiCo (1) Richmond (5) filibuster (1) cigarette advertising (1) food environment (1) violence prevention (8) Wendy Davis (1) choice (1) SB 402 (1) white house (1) inequities (1) news strategy (1) education (1) measure N (2) chronic disease (2) soda tax (11) cannes lions festival (1) Penn State (3) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Oglala Sioux (3) Gardasil (1) language (6) media analysis (6) obesity prevention (1) Big Tobacco (3) cancer prevention (1) indoor smoking ban (1) abortion (1) Black Lives Matter (1) Big Soda (2) social media (2) regulation (2) food access (1) Bill Cosby (1) youth (1) strategic communication (1) Marion Nestle (1) soda industry (4) food and beverage marketing (3) tobacco industry (2) auto safety (1) news (2) snap (1) Whiteclay (4) HPV vaccine (1) elephant triggers (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) weight of the nation (1) SSBs (1) Berkeley (2) democracy (1) Proposition 47 (1) cosmetics (1) Newtown (1) messaging (3) Bloomberg (3) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) seat belt laws (1) news analysis (3) junk food marketing to kids (2) cervical cancer (1) autism (1) nonprofit communications (1) sexual violence (2) campaign finance (1) advocacy (3) Twitter for advocacy (1) diabetes prevention (1) communication strategy (1) child sexual abuse (5) structural racism (1) children's health (3) social justice (2) Texas (1) sexual health (1) corporate social responsibility (1) gender (1) target marketing (9) gatorade bolt game (1) public health data (1) news monitoring (1) childhood adversity (1) community health (1) Michelle Obama (1) Rachel Grana (1) community organizing (1) institutional accountability (1) soda taxes (2) Joe Paterno (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) Sandy Hook (2) personal responsibility (3) health care (1) paper tigers (1) community safety (1) sandusky (2) authentic voices (1) community (1) prison system (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) water security (1) online marketing (1) food swamps (1) liana winett (1) sexual assault (1) Aurora (1) tobacco (5) journalism (1) Merck (1) Citizens United (1) Tea Party (1) naacp (1) media bites (1) front groups (1) food industry (4) tobacco tax (1) alcohol (5) privilege (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) Connecticut shooting (1) junk food marketing (4) Dora the Explorer (1) political correctness (1) social change (1) gun control (2) junk food (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) soda (12) water (1) vaccines (1) community violence (1) summer camps (1) SB-5 (1) Nickelodeon (1) stigma (1) cancer research (1) media (7) FCC (1) suicide nets (1) ACEs (2) government intrusion (1) social math (1) ssb (1) Twitter (1) Happy Meals (1) gun violence (1) obesity (10) San Francisco (3) Pine Ridge reservation (1) food justice (1) soda warning labels (1) prison phone calls (1) world water day (1) product safety (1) collaboration (1) El Monte (3) sanitation (1) race (1) Amanda Fallin (1) prevention (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) communication (2) default frame (1) childhood obesity (1) election 2016 (1) food (1) Proposition 29 (1) physical activity (1) Let's Move (1) violence (2) digital marketing (3) healthy eating (1) new year's resolutions (1) california (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) diabetes (1) news coverage (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) cap the tap (1) beverage industry (2) women's health (2) mental health (2) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) health equity (10) built environment (2) Telluride (1) marketing (1) george lakoff (1) framing (14) equity (3) SB 1000 (1) public health policy (2) apha (3) food marketing (5) Donald Trump (2) Catholic church (1) Chile (1) industry appeals to choice (1) suicide prevention (2) nanny state (2) Colorado (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: