Beyond reading, writing and arithmetic: Lessons in media advocacy from a first-grader

printer friendlyprinter friendly

A few weeks ago, my daughter came home upset about the "vote" that was needed to secure her much-awaited snowshoeing trip into Grand Teton National Park (GTNP), which is just a mile north of where we live in Jackson Hole, Wyoming.

When I was confused about which vote she meant — hadn't the teachers already confirmed the trip? — she told me that her first-grade teacher had explained the sobering reality to her class: Like all national parks and other government agencies, GTNP might be closed if Congress didn't vote to fund the federal budget.

Since the vote was scheduled for the night before the field trip, her teacher also had the class write letters to Congress about what the snowshoeing trip meant to them.

I was thrilled that my daughter's teacher took this important opportunity to teach a lesson about government and civic participation and ways to use media advocacy as a vehicle for policy change. And I was glad to talk with my daughter about how decisions in Washington affect our lives every day.

But, I wanted to say more.

I wanted to tell her that it wasn't the field trip that would be so disappointing for some of her classmates, but instead the dinner they wouldn't be getting because the Women, Infants and Children's nutrition program wasn't funded. That some of her friends' parents wouldn't have a job to go to the next day, which might mean they couldn't pay their rent at the end of the month. That some kids' grandparents wouldn't get to refill their medication because their health insurance was in the balance. Or, a palpable, daily fear in our community, that some children's parents could be deported at a moment's notice.

And yet, I didn't say any of this.

Because I'm white, educated and was born in the U.S. to parents (and grandparents) also born in the U.S., I could choose what I wanted to share with my sensitive 6-year-old and what difficult topics to avoid.

Unlike many families, mine is fortunate enough to have private health insurance, secure jobs and enough resources to pay for our basic needs, despite — at least so far — what happens at the federal level.

Not all parents were so lucky that night to put off difficult conversations, to allow children just to be children, and to worry only about fieldtrips instead of job security, access to medical care or even their family's ability to stay in this country.

Adults — all of us — can and should have these conversations with their children. In hindsight, I know I missed an important opportunity to connect my many roles — as a parent, advocate and media advocacy trainer — with my belief that the most important conversations about class and racial equity start at home and extend into the public sphere.

From now on, I will say more. Even if it's hard (or, perhaps, precisely because it is). Clearly one of the most important lessons from this experience isn't for my daughter, but for me and other adults who are similarly privileged: If we are going to effect change, our kids need parents and caregivers to have conversations that plant the seeds for personal growth and social progress.

I know — from history and the systems designed for white supremacy and other forms of oppression — that my kids will almost certainly grow up to enjoy the same privileges that I do. But, if I do my job well, they will also learn how important it is for families like ours to use civic engagement to advance racial and economic equity. They'll learn that we — those of us with such privilege — must speak out to demand better, not just for ourselves, but for our neighbors and classmates and friends, and even for people we don't even know. They'll also learn that outrage is not best applied to cancelled field trips, but to real issues, like injustice and discrimination.

In her own way, my daughter is already just as outraged as I am that the people in charge of taking care of this country aren't doing their job. And I'm happy to see her channeling that outrage in a productive way. Her class has already received a response to their letters. Sen. Michael Enzi wrote to my daughter's teacher earlier this month, noting that he understood the students' concern about National Parks availability and that he voted on Jan. 19 to keep the government open and again on Jan. 22 to re-open the government.

"We need to ensure Wyoming's National Parks remain safe, accessible, and open," he wrote. "I too grew up spending time enjoying our public lands and treasured those experiences. I try to visit Grand Teton every year. I maintain contact with both park superintendents and share my experiences with them as [well] as the experiences my constituents share with me, so thank you for your note and letters. I hope you were able to go snowshoeing."

Even with an unprecedented number of people contacting Congress over the past year, letter-writing it is still an effective way to reach our elected officials. And thanks to an early lesson in media advocacy, I know that this is only the first of many letters that my daughter will write.

A first-grader's letter to Congress

Have resources to share on any of the above themes? Please send them our way at

Interested in learning more? Here are just a few fantastic ideas to get you — and your kids — talking.

Raising Race-Conscious Children

Showing Up for Racial Justice — Organizing Families

Why White Parents Need to Talk to Their Children About Racism

public health (71) regulation (2) HPV vaccine (1) Citizens United (1) Bill Cosby (1) strategic communication (1) food justice (1) seat belt laws (1) government intrusion (1) Texas (1) Tea Party (1) sexual assault (1) sandusky (2) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) vaccines (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) values (1) Let's Move (1) safety (1) suicide prevention (2) food (1) corporate social responsibility (1) food marketing (5) tobacco tax (1) nonprofit communications (1) Penn State (3) reproductive justice (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) health care (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Richmond (5) diabetes (1) women's health (2) auto safety (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Black Lives Matter (1) marketing (1) target marketing (9) gun violence (1) nanny state (2) Telluride (1) violence prevention (8) Sandy Hook (2) Marion Nestle (1) Coca-Cola (3) Big Tobacco (3) Merck (1) sexism (2) social media (2) community (1) Berkeley (2) white house (1) paula deen (1) community organizing (1) sexual violence (2) tobacco industry (2) Johnson & Johnson (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Bloomberg (3) language (6) Proposition 47 (1) Aurora (1) Measure O (1) industry appeals to choice (1) Proposition 29 (1) emergency contraception (1) chronic disease (2) equity (3) Michelle Obama (1) child sexual abuse (5) campaign finance (1) SSBs (1) food deserts (1) breastfeeding (3) prevention (1) Happy Meals (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) naacp (1) Gardasil (1) california (1) filibuster (1) political correctness (1) news (2) racism (1) new year's resolutions (1) childhood adversity (1) paper tigers (1) children's health (3) ssb (1) environmental health (1) structural racism (1) health equity (10) Colorado (1) McDonald's (1) Joe Paterno (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Nickelodeon (1) news monitoring (1) cancer research (1) inequities (1) gun control (2) mental health (2) gender (1) personal responsibility (3) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) Big Soda (2) obesity prevention (1) social justice (2) communication (2) Twitter for advocacy (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) water (1) obesity (10) sports drinks (1) Catholic church (1) media (7) food and beverage marketing (3) autism (1) front groups (1) cannes lions festival (1) apha (3) race (1) choice (1) online marketing (1) water security (1) public health policy (2) soda warning labels (1) Twitter (1) summer camps (1) food industry (4) food swamps (1) media advocacy (23) Chile (1) Big Food (2) Jerry Sandusky (3) media bites (1) default frame (1) food access (1) cap the tap (1) cosmetics (1) community safety (1) media analysis (6) beverage industry (2) news coverage (1) physical activity (1) youth (1) liana winett (1) cigarette advertising (1) prison phone calls (1) food environment (1) sugary drinks (10) diabetes prevention (1) world water day (1) election 2016 (1) childhood trauma (3) childhood obesity (1) collaboration (1) indoor smoking ban (1) social change (1) cancer prevention (1) sanitation (1) SB 402 (1) junk food marketing (4) advocacy (3) framing (14) tobacco control (2) privilege (1) measure N (2) Newtown (1) abortion (1) community violence (1) social math (1) news analysis (3) Golden Gate Bridge (2) institutional accountability (1) digital marketing (3) Oakland Unified School District (1) authentic voices (1) gatorade bolt game (1) suicide barrier (2) American Beverage Association (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) elephant triggers (1) weight of the nation (1) tobacco (5) soda (12) prison system (1) PepsiCo (1) suicide nets (1) SB-5 (1) beauty products (1) Rachel Grana (1) SB 1000 (1) Whiteclay (4) snap (1) healthy eating (1) Donald Trump (2) communication strategy (1) public health data (1) soda taxes (2) george lakoff (1) Sam Kass (1) violence (2) ACEs (2) cervical cancer (1) messaging (3) genital warts (1) community health (1) built environment (2) Wendy Davis (1) democracy (1) sexual health (1) news strategy (1) education (1) journalism (1) junk food (2) product safety (1) El Monte (3) Amanda Fallin (1) stigma (1) Oglala Sioux (3) FCC (1) San Francisco (3) Connecticut shooting (1) alcohol (5) soda tax (11) soda industry (4) childhood obestiy conference (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: