McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.

social media (2) communication strategy (1) gender (1) health care (1) youth (1) cap the tap (1) health equity (10) beverage industry (2) media (7) food industry (4) Richmond (5) American Beverage Association (1) news coverage (1) Penn State (3) community (1) cancer research (1) Newtown (1) Michelle Obama (1) gatorade bolt game (1) food marketing (5) news (2) social change (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Proposition 47 (1) gun violence (1) Nickelodeon (1) public health policy (2) food environment (1) ssb (1) communication (2) Oakland Unified School District (1) cigarette advertising (1) beauty products (1) Colorado (1) breastfeeding (3) liana winett (1) gun control (2) vaccines (1) obesity (10) soda industry (4) Texas (1) default frame (1) soda taxes (2) SB 1000 (1) social justice (2) framing (14) abortion (1) marketing (1) childhood trauma (3) Let's Move (1) junk food marketing (4) Bloomberg (3) Big Tobacco (3) emergency contraception (1) digital marketing (3) sports drinks (1) nonprofit communications (1) Sandy Hook (2) alcohol (5) healthy eating (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) Big Soda (2) community safety (1) sexual violence (2) Tea Party (1) sexism (2) Wendy Davis (1) diabetes prevention (1) soda (12) seat belt laws (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) prison system (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) women's health (2) Whiteclay (4) Oglala Sioux (3) suicide nets (1) summer camps (1) tobacco control (2) industry appeals to choice (1) SSBs (1) Coca-Cola (3) sexual health (1) suicide barrier (2) indoor smoking ban (1) social math (1) weight of the nation (1) child sexual abuse (5) inequities (1) soda tax (11) San Francisco (3) food swamps (1) stigma (1) SB-5 (1) tobacco industry (2) Proposition 29 (1) campaign finance (1) privilege (1) Catholic church (1) apha (3) Connecticut shooting (1) democracy (1) food deserts (1) Measure O (1) naacp (1) cannes lions festival (1) Merck (1) environmental health (1) food access (1) cancer prevention (1) george lakoff (1) cosmetics (1) media advocacy (23) violence (2) El Monte (3) sanitation (1) food and beverage marketing (3) public health data (1) food justice (1) autism (1) regulation (2) suicide prevention (2) Dora the Explorer (1) community organizing (1) auto safety (1) snap (1) news analysis (3) Gardasil (1) Black Lives Matter (1) Twitter (1) ACEs (2) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) government intrusion (1) paula deen (1) Aurora (1) news monitoring (1) SB 402 (1) prevention (1) genital warts (1) Joe Paterno (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) FCC (1) paper tigers (1) equity (3) political correctness (1) food (1) new year's resolutions (1) online marketing (1) Big Food (2) Amanda Fallin (1) sexual assault (1) junk food (2) election 2016 (1) childhood adversity (1) water security (1) reproductive justice (1) target marketing (9) world water day (1) white house (1) advocacy (3) Sam Kass (1) childhood obesity (1) corporate social responsibility (1) McDonald's (1) violence prevention (8) chronic disease (2) sugary drinks (10) nanny state (2) cervical cancer (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) mental health (2) measure N (2) public health (71) journalism (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) Donald Trump (2) product safety (1) built environment (2) values (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) personal responsibility (3) prison phone calls (1) choice (1) front groups (1) elephant triggers (1) messaging (3) language (6) childhood lead poisoning (1) soda warning labels (1) media analysis (6) Berkeley (2) filibuster (1) news strategy (1) Marion Nestle (1) Rachel Grana (1) Chile (1) california (1) physical activity (1) water (1) Happy Meals (1) education (1) PepsiCo (1) diabetes (1) HPV vaccine (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) authentic voices (1) media bites (1) Bill Cosby (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Telluride (1) tobacco tax (1) obesity prevention (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) structural racism (1) community health (1) tobacco (5) racism (1) collaboration (1) community violence (1) Citizens United (1) institutional accountability (1) strategic communication (1) safety (1) sandusky (2) race (1) children's health (3) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: