McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.

Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) food justice (1) default frame (1) sports drinks (1) food (1) childhood adversity (1) privilege (1) mental health (2) gun violence (1) Chile (1) inequities (1) education (1) community health (1) emergency contraception (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) choice (1) abortion (1) Berkeley (2) childhood obesity (1) social math (1) weight of the nation (1) beauty products (1) news (2) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Telluride (1) community organizing (1) soda tax (11) alcohol (5) media analysis (6) PepsiCo (1) news monitoring (1) media bites (1) Bloomberg (3) community violence (1) Newtown (1) food and beverage marketing (3) food environment (1) Connecticut shooting (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) autism (1) Gardasil (1) American Beverage Association (1) tobacco tax (1) El Monte (3) Johnson & Johnson (1) indoor smoking ban (1) Catholic church (1) george lakoff (1) campaign finance (1) youth (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) FCC (1) online marketing (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) target marketing (9) Proposition 47 (1) Big Tobacco (3) reproductive justice (1) elephant triggers (1) collaboration (1) Oglala Sioux (3) filibuster (1) SSBs (1) Whiteclay (4) Wendy Davis (1) authentic voices (1) suicide prevention (2) children's health (3) Rachel Grana (1) healthy eating (1) McDonald's (1) water (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) food access (1) suicide nets (1) institutional accountability (1) framing (14) news analysis (3) women's health (2) junk food (2) apha (3) prevention (1) genital warts (1) Coca-Cola (3) SB-5 (1) Measure O (1) environmental health (1) tobacco industry (2) race (1) communication strategy (1) new year's resolutions (1) childhood trauma (3) San Francisco (3) paper tigers (1) nonprofit communications (1) regulation (2) Big Soda (2) measure N (2) public health data (1) health care (1) naacp (1) Bill Cosby (1) digital marketing (3) industry appeals to choice (1) cannes lions festival (1) breastfeeding (3) nanny state (2) Colorado (1) racism (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) democracy (1) Sandy Hook (2) Happy Meals (1) food industry (4) HPV vaccine (1) sexism (2) public health policy (2) soda industry (4) front groups (1) physical activity (1) tobacco (5) water security (1) food deserts (1) journalism (1) Twitter (1) social media (2) california (1) seat belt laws (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) public health (71) soda taxes (2) SB 1000 (1) advocacy (3) Penn State (3) built environment (2) news coverage (1) food swamps (1) prison phone calls (1) obesity prevention (1) Marion Nestle (1) cosmetics (1) Michelle Obama (1) summer camps (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) social justice (2) SB 402 (1) corporate social responsibility (1) health equity (10) adverse childhood experiences (3) messaging (3) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) gatorade bolt game (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) prison system (1) junk food marketing (4) auto safety (1) political correctness (1) food marketing (5) diabetes (1) equity (3) gender (1) community (1) media advocacy (23) community safety (1) Proposition 29 (1) sexual health (1) cigarette advertising (1) stigma (1) tobacco control (2) chronic disease (2) Amanda Fallin (1) ACEs (2) Dora the Explorer (1) obesity (10) Citizens United (1) sugary drinks (10) Merck (1) cancer prevention (1) cancer research (1) world water day (1) Sam Kass (1) sexual assault (1) personal responsibility (3) Texas (1) soda warning labels (1) suicide barrier (2) paula deen (1) violence prevention (8) ssb (1) government intrusion (1) sanitation (1) cap the tap (1) election 2016 (1) white house (1) Joe Paterno (1) Richmond (5) soda (12) violence (2) Black Lives Matter (1) safety (1) sandusky (2) marketing (1) values (1) cervical cancer (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) gun control (2) Donald Trump (2) media (7) Let's Move (1) strategic communication (1) Aurora (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) sexual violence (2) product safety (1) language (6) snap (1) liana winett (1) vaccines (1) diabetes prevention (1) Tea Party (1) news strategy (1) Nickelodeon (1) child sexual abuse (5) beverage industry (2) social change (1) Big Food (2) communication (2) structural racism (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: