McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.


emergency contraception (1) McDonald's (1) San Francisco (3) social change (1) election 2016 (1) white house (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) diabetes prevention (1) weight of the nation (1) digital marketing (3) autism (1) SB 1000 (1) choice (1) soda industry (4) FCC (1) food environment (1) authentic voices (1) stigma (1) breastfeeding (3) junk food (2) Bill Cosby (1) community safety (1) children's health (3) community (1) strategic communication (1) chronic disease (2) social math (1) nonprofit communications (1) sexual violence (2) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) corporate social responsibility (1) Measure O (1) health equity (10) cannes lions festival (1) Big Soda (2) Wendy Davis (1) gender (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) political correctness (1) california (1) diabetes (1) women's health (2) messaging (3) food deserts (1) obesity prevention (1) Sam Kass (1) sugary drinks (10) indoor smoking ban (1) nanny state (2) Happy Meals (1) news (2) HPV vaccine (1) gatorade bolt game (1) default frame (1) Whiteclay (4) liana winett (1) tobacco control (2) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) news monitoring (1) language (6) Twitter for advocacy (1) abortion (1) marketing (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) child sexual abuse (5) Newtown (1) media bites (1) framing (14) food (1) naacp (1) sexism (2) media advocacy (23) American Beverage Association (1) news analysis (3) childhood trauma (3) product safety (1) advocacy (3) race (1) Joe Paterno (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) ACEs (2) SSBs (1) tobacco industry (2) media analysis (6) soda tax (11) Big Food (2) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) snap (1) democracy (1) Gardasil (1) gun control (2) front groups (1) Let's Move (1) water (1) communication strategy (1) Oglala Sioux (3) cap the tap (1) Aurora (1) industry appeals to choice (1) food industry (4) Dora the Explorer (1) Nickelodeon (1) news coverage (1) privilege (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) health care (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) Telluride (1) filibuster (1) structural racism (1) soda warning labels (1) sanitation (1) Connecticut shooting (1) sexual health (1) target marketing (9) community organizing (1) PepsiCo (1) elephant triggers (1) Sandy Hook (2) gun violence (1) Michelle Obama (1) violence (2) inequities (1) Berkeley (2) SB 402 (1) tobacco tax (1) collaboration (1) media (7) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) cosmetics (1) personal responsibility (3) public health data (1) sexual assault (1) Penn State (3) campaign finance (1) beverage industry (2) Citizens United (1) ssb (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) SB-5 (1) social media (2) Bloomberg (3) Coca-Cola (3) sandusky (2) food and beverage marketing (3) public health (71) george lakoff (1) Rachel Grana (1) beauty products (1) Amanda Fallin (1) community health (1) communication (2) Proposition 29 (1) new year's resolutions (1) Richmond (5) social justice (2) built environment (2) institutional accountability (1) community violence (1) education (1) news strategy (1) El Monte (3) mental health (2) food swamps (1) Black Lives Matter (1) alcohol (5) obesity (10) sports drinks (1) violence prevention (8) Colorado (1) cancer research (1) paper tigers (1) Twitter (1) water security (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) auto safety (1) physical activity (1) Merck (1) summer camps (1) vaccines (1) values (1) Big Tobacco (3) suicide nets (1) online marketing (1) Donald Trump (2) genital warts (1) Chile (1) youth (1) prison phone calls (1) childhood obesity (1) government intrusion (1) junk food marketing (4) food access (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) tobacco (5) cancer prevention (1) prison system (1) Proposition 47 (1) apha (3) food justice (1) world water day (1) safety (1) Catholic church (1) reproductive justice (1) suicide barrier (2) childhood obestiy conference (1) prevention (1) racism (1) food marketing (5) regulation (2) soda taxes (2) soda (12) cigarette advertising (1) seat belt laws (1) Marion Nestle (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Texas (1) childhood adversity (1) paula deen (1) environmental health (1) Tea Party (1) healthy eating (1) measure N (2) journalism (1) equity (3) cervical cancer (1) public health policy (2) suicide prevention (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: