McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.

cosmetics (1) public health policy (2) new year's resolutions (1) Merck (1) violence (2) campaign finance (1) nanny state (2) news strategy (1) Amanda Fallin (1) naacp (1) digital marketing (2) Berkeley (2) cancer research (1) soda industry (4) cigarette advertising (1) indoor smoking ban (1) political correctness (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) San Francisco (3) Black Lives Matter (1) water security (1) liana winett (1) environmental health (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) corporate social responsibility (1) community safety (1) media (7) sanitation (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) reproductive justice (1) structural racism (1) gender (1) Sam Kass (1) autism (1) social justice (2) junk food marketing to kids (2) choice (1) SSBs (1) Measure O (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) sports drinks (1) Big Soda (2) Aurora (1) Chile (1) measure N (2) prison phone calls (1) Michelle Obama (1) seat belt laws (1) breastfeeding (3) media advocacy (23) strategic communication (1) tobacco tax (1) food industry (4) food access (1) nonprofit communications (1) food marketing (4) sexual health (1) Joe Paterno (1) racism (1) youth (1) regulation (2) media analysis (6) gatorade bolt game (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) ssb (1) world water day (1) soda taxes (2) children's health (3) Texas (1) food environment (1) Proposition 47 (1) childhood obesity (1) Let's Move (1) communication strategy (1) white house (1) suicide barrier (2) filibuster (1) news monitoring (1) sugary drinks (10) language (6) framing (14) gun control (2) Oglala Sioux (3) advocacy (3) soda warning labels (1) community health (1) ACEs (2) democracy (1) obesity prevention (1) weight of the nation (1) race (1) Nickelodeon (1) Twitter (1) journalism (1) social math (1) gun violence (1) california (1) junk food marketing (4) Bill Cosby (1) public health (70) tobacco industry (2) Telluride (1) HPV vaccine (1) public health data (1) safety (1) community (1) Rachel Grana (1) food (1) mental health (2) Coca-Cola (3) messaging (3) PepsiCo (1) Marion Nestle (1) product safety (1) soda (12) food and beverage marketing (3) SB-5 (1) news coverage (1) values (1) snap (1) sandusky (2) El Monte (3) george lakoff (1) health care (1) chronic disease (2) SB 1000 (1) cap the tap (1) news (2) Citizens United (1) elephant triggers (1) Big Food (2) food swamps (1) equity (3) American Beverage Association (1) social media (2) Donald Trump (2) Proposition 29 (1) inequities (1) McDonald's (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Whiteclay (4) water (1) prevention (1) sexism (2) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Catholic church (1) Big Tobacco (3) sexual assault (1) Newtown (1) media bites (1) social change (1) front groups (1) community organizing (1) junk food (2) summer camps (1) sexual violence (2) beverage industry (2) emergency contraception (1) violence prevention (8) beauty products (1) SB 402 (1) diabetes (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) cannes lions festival (1) authentic voices (1) news analysis (3) soda tax (11) Sandy Hook (2) Gardasil (1) Wendy Davis (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) government intrusion (1) childhood trauma (3) cervical cancer (1) FCC (1) diabetes prevention (1) collaboration (1) default frame (1) healthy eating (1) marketing (1) election 2016 (1) cancer prevention (1) food deserts (1) alcohol (5) Richmond (5) paper tigers (1) Connecticut shooting (1) prison system (1) privilege (1) target marketing (8) Twitter for advocacy (1) online marketing (1) auto safety (1) industry appeals to choice (1) apha (3) Colorado (1) abortion (1) education (1) genital warts (1) women's health (2) childhood adversity (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Happy Meals (1) institutional accountability (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) obesity (10) food justice (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) paula deen (1) health equity (10) community violence (1) suicide prevention (2) adverse childhood experiences (3) Tea Party (1) child sexual abuse (5) suicide nets (1) stigma (1) Penn State (3) tobacco (5) Bloomberg (3) vaccines (1) personal responsibility (3) physical activity (1) tobacco control (2) communication (2) built environment (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: