Media coverage of autism study leaves out critical context

printer friendlyprinter friendly

There has been a lot of media attention on a new study published in Pediatrics that links obesity during pregnancy to increased risk of autism. The researchers studied more than 1,000 children in California and found that the risk of autism was 60% higher among those born to mothers who were obese, hypertensive or diabetic during their pregnancy.

Autism spectrum disorders appear to be on the rise in the United States, and research about the possible causes of this increase is vital. However, news coverage of this latest study is problematic because it frames autism as a problem that may primarily be the responsibility of mothers, giving little to no attention to the many social, cultural, and environmental factors that research has shown to contribute to obesity. For example, mothers cannot determine how many stores offer decently priced fresh foods. They cannot overpower the food and beverage industry that spends millions of dollars every hour marketing cheap fast foods and sugary beverages. They cannot single-handedly improve the safety of their neighborhoods to make them more walkable or conducive to physical activity.

Though most articles acknowledge the study's limits and caution against drawing premature conclusions about potential connections between obesity and autism, they nevertheless point to what pregnant women should be doing differently to lose weight. An LA Times article encourages diet and exercise in the first sentence, and NPR paraphrases a study author, saying, "[I]t's clearly a good idea for women who are overweight or obese to try to slim down before becoming pregnant."

This is not the first time that news coverage of a health issue has reinforced a "mother blaming" frame. For example, much coverage of breastfeeding, which has many known health benefits, tends to scold mothers who don't breastfeed rather than exploring the barriers in the workplace, hospital and other locations that make it hard for women to nurse.

Academics, professionals, and journalists who want to improve our public's health need to be critical of the contextual factors that influence it. Reporters -- and the advocates who talk with them -- should explain and illustrate the conditions that precede individual decision-making. By widening the lens, we will identify other institutions that are accountable, such as city councils or the food beverage industry, in the case of obesity, that can help provide healthier environments for mothers, children and all people alike.


McDonald's (1) chronic disease (2) sports drinks (1) news coverage (1) abortion (1) suicide nets (1) public health policy (2) stigma (1) Texas (1) Chile (1) product safety (1) california (1) Merck (1) obesity prevention (1) public health data (1) media (7) health equity (10) Sam Kass (1) media analysis (6) tobacco tax (1) personal responsibility (3) PepsiCo (1) gender (1) food justice (1) cosmetics (1) snap (1) built environment (2) sugary drinks (10) SB-5 (1) advocacy (3) privilege (1) community organizing (1) food access (1) online marketing (1) HPV vaccine (1) violence prevention (8) ACEs (2) genital warts (1) race (1) beverage industry (2) physical activity (1) industry appeals to choice (1) cap the tap (1) Proposition 29 (1) Big Food (2) childhood adversity (1) food deserts (1) sexism (2) apha (3) messaging (3) gun violence (1) junk food (2) public health (70) Donald Trump (2) childhood trauma (3) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) gun control (2) soda taxes (2) Colorado (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) Aurora (1) Joe Paterno (1) Black Lives Matter (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) elephant triggers (1) alcohol (5) breastfeeding (3) Telluride (1) Bloomberg (3) Amanda Fallin (1) Gardasil (1) Catholic church (1) youth (1) government intrusion (1) Penn State (3) food (1) prison phone calls (1) paper tigers (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Whiteclay (4) Citizens United (1) Newtown (1) institutional accountability (1) vaccines (1) cannes lions festival (1) soda (12) sanitation (1) news (2) Dora the Explorer (1) social media (2) media advocacy (23) Coca-Cola (3) social math (1) beauty products (1) emergency contraception (1) Let's Move (1) food and beverage marketing (3) Golden Gate Bridge (2) environmental health (1) women's health (2) tobacco (5) cancer research (1) Michelle Obama (1) violence (2) measure N (2) prevention (1) suicide barrier (2) marketing (1) Big Soda (2) community (1) children's health (3) journalism (1) front groups (1) new year's resolutions (1) social justice (2) education (1) soda warning labels (1) communication (2) Tea Party (1) diabetes (1) Nickelodeon (1) Bill Cosby (1) sexual assault (1) george lakoff (1) reproductive justice (1) campaign finance (1) default frame (1) election 2016 (1) social change (1) nanny state (2) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) equity (3) Happy Meals (1) Connecticut shooting (1) water (1) SB 402 (1) gatorade bolt game (1) cancer prevention (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) sandusky (2) community safety (1) suicide prevention (2) news strategy (1) tobacco industry (2) San Francisco (3) digital marketing (2) child sexual abuse (5) racism (1) junk food marketing (4) communication strategy (1) news monitoring (1) soda industry (4) corporate social responsibility (1) sexual health (1) world water day (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) autism (1) mental health (2) filibuster (1) naacp (1) strategic communication (1) liana winett (1) FCC (1) healthy eating (1) inequities (1) summer camps (1) health care (1) community violence (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) diabetes prevention (1) cigarette advertising (1) Big Tobacco (3) Sandy Hook (2) collaboration (1) obesity (10) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Twitter (1) prison system (1) food marketing (4) food swamps (1) media bites (1) authentic voices (1) Wendy Davis (1) Oglala Sioux (3) Twitter for advocacy (1) tobacco control (2) food industry (4) language (6) food environment (1) cervical cancer (1) paula deen (1) soda tax (11) news analysis (3) target marketing (8) white house (1) nonprofit communications (1) values (1) Measure O (1) sexual violence (2) water security (1) El Monte (3) choice (1) Marion Nestle (1) Berkeley (2) structural racism (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) safety (1) seat belt laws (1) community health (1) framing (14) SSBs (1) weight of the nation (1) auto safety (1) SB 1000 (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) ssb (1) childhood obesity (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) political correctness (1) Proposition 47 (1) indoor smoking ban (1) Rachel Grana (1) regulation (2) democracy (1) American Beverage Association (1) Richmond (5) Jerry Sandusky (3)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: