Media coverage of autism study leaves out critical context

printer friendlyprinter friendly

There has been a lot of media attention on a new study published in Pediatrics that links obesity during pregnancy to increased risk of autism. The researchers studied more than 1,000 children in California and found that the risk of autism was 60% higher among those born to mothers who were obese, hypertensive or diabetic during their pregnancy.

Autism spectrum disorders appear to be on the rise in the United States, and research about the possible causes of this increase is vital. However, news coverage of this latest study is problematic because it frames autism as a problem that may primarily be the responsibility of mothers, giving little to no attention to the many social, cultural, and environmental factors that research has shown to contribute to obesity. For example, mothers cannot determine how many stores offer decently priced fresh foods. They cannot overpower the food and beverage industry that spends millions of dollars every hour marketing cheap fast foods and sugary beverages. They cannot single-handedly improve the safety of their neighborhoods to make them more walkable or conducive to physical activity.

Though most articles acknowledge the study's limits and caution against drawing premature conclusions about potential connections between obesity and autism, they nevertheless point to what pregnant women should be doing differently to lose weight. An LA Times article encourages diet and exercise in the first sentence, and NPR paraphrases a study author, saying, "[I]t's clearly a good idea for women who are overweight or obese to try to slim down before becoming pregnant."

This is not the first time that news coverage of a health issue has reinforced a "mother blaming" frame. For example, much coverage of breastfeeding, which has many known health benefits, tends to scold mothers who don't breastfeed rather than exploring the barriers in the workplace, hospital and other locations that make it hard for women to nurse.

Academics, professionals, and journalists who want to improve our public's health need to be critical of the contextual factors that influence it. Reporters -- and the advocates who talk with them -- should explain and illustrate the conditions that precede individual decision-making. By widening the lens, we will identify other institutions that are accountable, such as city councils or the food beverage industry, in the case of obesity, that can help provide healthier environments for mothers, children and all people alike.


Whiteclay (4) Proposition 29 (1) sexual health (1) vaccines (1) suicide barrier (2) PepsiCo (1) soda taxes (2) children's health (3) prison system (1) gun control (2) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) Berkeley (2) junk food marketing (4) prison phone calls (1) elephant triggers (1) digital marketing (3) Connecticut shooting (1) tobacco tax (1) cancer prevention (1) Nickelodeon (1) El Monte (3) race (1) messaging (3) chronic disease (2) sugary drinks (10) breastfeeding (3) built environment (2) world water day (1) suicide nets (1) weight of the nation (1) food deserts (1) nanny state (2) news (2) food marketing (5) education (1) diabetes (1) news analysis (3) regulation (2) Amanda Fallin (1) snap (1) indoor smoking ban (1) marketing (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) industry appeals to choice (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) inequities (1) Merck (1) social justice (2) diabetes prevention (1) food and beverage marketing (3) Marion Nestle (1) cervical cancer (1) Richmond (5) authentic voices (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) choice (1) community health (1) collaboration (1) Catholic church (1) social change (1) community safety (1) Newtown (1) community violence (1) soda (12) youth (1) Tea Party (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) political correctness (1) news strategy (1) soda industry (4) media (7) media advocacy (23) Citizens United (1) Donald Trump (2) cannes lions festival (1) food swamps (1) child sexual abuse (5) Sam Kass (1) McDonald's (1) structural racism (1) campaign finance (1) Coca-Cola (3) SB 1000 (1) public health policy (2) corporate social responsibility (1) SB-5 (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) American Beverage Association (1) Proposition 47 (1) community (1) tobacco industry (2) nonprofit communications (1) community organizing (1) social media (2) ssb (1) Texas (1) violence (2) adverse childhood experiences (3) sexism (2) Bill Cosby (1) tobacco (5) paula deen (1) Measure O (1) framing (14) media analysis (6) environmental health (1) news monitoring (1) advocacy (3) beverage industry (2) Rachel Grana (1) Telluride (1) health care (1) Black Lives Matter (1) obesity prevention (1) childhood trauma (3) soda warning labels (1) Happy Meals (1) apha (3) San Francisco (3) Bloomberg (3) gun violence (1) healthy eating (1) language (6) prevention (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) cosmetics (1) white house (1) Penn State (3) government intrusion (1) racism (1) FCC (1) Wendy Davis (1) stigma (1) naacp (1) Gardasil (1) food access (1) seat belt laws (1) personal responsibility (3) front groups (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) communication (2) communication strategy (1) water (1) food justice (1) Chile (1) liana winett (1) physical activity (1) Let's Move (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) childhood adversity (1) Colorado (1) food industry (4) summer camps (1) Big Soda (2) california (1) george lakoff (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) childhood obesity (1) target marketing (9) reproductive justice (1) sexual violence (2) safety (1) journalism (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) tobacco control (2) privilege (1) news coverage (1) mental health (2) Twitter for advocacy (1) strategic communication (1) emergency contraception (1) Dora the Explorer (1) health equity (10) childhood lead poisoning (1) Joe Paterno (1) abortion (1) default frame (1) Oglala Sioux (3) sandusky (2) sanitation (1) gender (1) violence prevention (8) HPV vaccine (1) food environment (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) soda tax (11) values (1) alcohol (5) autism (1) public health data (1) measure N (2) Michelle Obama (1) paper tigers (1) Sandy Hook (2) SB 402 (1) obesity (10) auto safety (1) public health (71) Big Food (2) cancer research (1) election 2016 (1) beauty products (1) institutional accountability (1) cigarette advertising (1) food (1) Twitter (1) junk food (2) Aurora (1) Big Tobacco (3) gatorade bolt game (1) new year's resolutions (1) ACEs (2) online marketing (1) media bites (1) filibuster (1) democracy (1) sports drinks (1) product safety (1) cap the tap (1) water security (1) sexual assault (1) women's health (2) social math (1) genital warts (1) SSBs (1) equity (3) suicide prevention (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: