What do media portrayals of Bill Cosby mean for prevention?

printer friendlyprinter friendly

"Oye, por ahi viene Bill Cosby!"

With salsa music playing over the opening credits and a male voice announcing in Spanish, "Hey, here comes Bill Cosby!" I thought The Cosby Show had finally come to represent the true diversity of our nation in the mid-90s.

He even introduced Latino characters to his show like Sonia Braga, the beautiful and talented — albeit oddly cast — Brazilian actress who played Mrs. Westlake, a high school teacher of Theo Huxtable, Cosby's son on the show.

Despite the somewhat bland, squeaky-clean nature of his family comedy, I had gained a new respect for Cosby (save for his later, weird campaign on young black men-blaming).

I must admit that my initial reaction to recent allegations of sexual abuse by the veteran comedian was similar to many who grew up watching his shows (including my childhood favorite, the Saturday-morning cartoon series Fat Albert and The Cosby Kids). I felt incredulous. How could a man who had come to represent so many positive values around family, children and even racial and ethnic equality do such horrific things to so many women?

At Berkeley Media Studies Group, we're asking — and currently researching — a much bigger, more important question: How do the media cover the issue of sexual violence and how does it impact the public conversation, and, ultimately, public policy? Working with the National Sexual Violence Resource Center, we are seeking to uncover the most effective ways to change the public conversation about sexual violence to include a prevention perspective.

To be sure, Cosby is the latest, and likely most tenable, lightning rod on the issue of sexual violence. With alleged victims, once hidden from view, continuing to come forth, as well as defenders (Phylicia Rashad, who played Cosby's wife on The Cosby Show, this week told a reporter that claims against her TV husband must be "orchestrated"), the ongoing saga of drugging and rape accusations against the comedian will likely continue for weeks to come.

But how is media coverage of Cosby different — as well as similar — to other less visible stories of sexual and other types of violence against women? One key finding from our 2003 study of California newspaper coverage of intimate partner violence was that most of these cases went unreported. Readers saw only the most extreme cases.

Just as the absence of reporting about more typical intimate partner violence distorted the picture and made it more difficult to understand and address the problem, does that pattern continue today? And have we made any progress toward our goal of the news media including more of a focus on causes, intervention and prevention?

Our recent research on news coverage of child sexual abuse could also offer a glimpse into what we may find in current stories about sexual violence. Our 2011 report found that, similar to intimate partner violence, news coverage of child sexual abuse was infrequent. When it did occur, it was often tied to a "moment" in the criminal justice process. This resulted in scant coverage of prevention since most reports focused on an incident after the fact. We also found that language in stories about child sexual abuse was vague and imprecise, making it harder for readers to fully understand what really happened.

That same year, as with Cosby, there appeared one name that dominated news coverage of sexual abuse: former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky. Following a two-year grand jury investigation, Sandusky was arrested and charged with 52 counts of sexual abuse against young boys. In June 2012, Sandusky was found guilty of 45 of the charges.

Among the findings in that report was that less than one-fifth of all stories examined discussed the impact of abuse and subsequent cover-up on the survivors — considerably less than the extensive coverage of the consequences faced by Sandusky as well as Penn State football coach Joe Paterno, university officials, and others.

When coverage includes more details about alleged perpetrators and less information about those experiencing abuse or violence, these stories may inadvertently provide a sympathetic portrayal of the accused. In the Sandusky coverage, we read about Paterno as a "legendary" and "beloved" football coach whose career had been tainted by the "scandal" brought on by his assistant, who was portrayed as a "monster in their midst."

I have to wonder how Cosby will ultimately be portrayed. A fallen hero or a monster in our popular culture? More importantly, will his venerable celebrity status distract from the real issue at hand: How do we keep sexual assault from happening in the first place?

summer camps (1) Dora the Explorer (1) community (1) equity (3) Michelle Obama (1) soda (12) suicide barrier (2) community health (1) food and beverage marketing (3) autism (1) Oglala Sioux (3) corporate social responsibility (1) SB 402 (1) Connecticut shooting (1) news (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) privilege (1) news analysis (3) collaboration (1) Big Soda (2) violence prevention (8) structural racism (1) gun control (2) advocacy (3) democracy (1) suicide prevention (2) childhood trauma (3) prevention (1) paula deen (1) media advocacy (23) filibuster (1) Tea Party (1) gender (1) cancer research (1) cancer prevention (1) Penn State (3) prison system (1) Texas (1) naacp (1) genital warts (1) personal responsibility (3) Pine Ridge reservation (1) strategic communication (1) online marketing (1) Let's Move (1) digital marketing (3) ACEs (2) measure N (2) food justice (1) public health (71) news strategy (1) Colorado (1) soda tax (11) values (1) institutional accountability (1) liana winett (1) george lakoff (1) Aurora (1) california (1) women's health (2) children's health (3) health equity (10) child sexual abuse (5) industry appeals to choice (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) San Francisco (3) elephant triggers (1) Twitter (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) Amanda Fallin (1) Berkeley (2) communication strategy (1) food deserts (1) communication (2) Catholic church (1) childhood obesity (1) tobacco tax (1) sports drinks (1) diabetes prevention (1) cannes lions festival (1) Newtown (1) Nickelodeon (1) nonprofit communications (1) social math (1) stigma (1) sanitation (1) auto safety (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) product safety (1) front groups (1) youth (1) physical activity (1) built environment (2) prison phone calls (1) PepsiCo (1) education (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) SB 1000 (1) Black Lives Matter (1) indoor smoking ban (1) news monitoring (1) inequities (1) American Beverage Association (1) FCC (1) obesity (10) Donald Trump (2) Whiteclay (4) media (7) gun violence (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) public health policy (2) community safety (1) community organizing (1) sexism (2) government intrusion (1) racism (1) vaccines (1) race (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) breastfeeding (3) Sam Kass (1) chronic disease (2) social change (1) beverage industry (2) obesity prevention (1) food (1) election 2016 (1) Bloomberg (3) target marketing (9) journalism (1) safety (1) media analysis (6) soda taxes (2) Gardasil (1) cervical cancer (1) soda warning labels (1) junk food marketing (4) mental health (2) Citizens United (1) Measure O (1) SB-5 (1) junk food (2) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) regulation (2) world water day (1) cigarette advertising (1) Proposition 29 (1) sexual violence (2) food access (1) food environment (1) HPV vaccine (1) violence (2) Proposition 47 (1) campaign finance (1) sandusky (2) sugary drinks (10) weight of the nation (1) environmental health (1) emergency contraception (1) suicide nets (1) gatorade bolt game (1) tobacco (5) soda industry (4) beauty products (1) McDonald's (1) Richmond (5) community violence (1) Bill Cosby (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) apha (3) childhood adversity (1) food swamps (1) language (6) El Monte (3) Wendy Davis (1) abortion (1) Rachel Grana (1) cosmetics (1) Merck (1) choice (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) seat belt laws (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) paper tigers (1) snap (1) SSBs (1) cap the tap (1) political correctness (1) Marion Nestle (1) alcohol (5) adverse childhood experiences (3) nanny state (2) water (1) Happy Meals (1) Joe Paterno (1) media bites (1) food industry (4) Big Food (2) marketing (1) authentic voices (1) sexual assault (1) diabetes (1) default frame (1) public health data (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) food marketing (5) new year's resolutions (1) Sandy Hook (2) Telluride (1) sexual health (1) tobacco control (2) tobacco industry (2) water security (1) Chile (1) Coca-Cola (3) social media (2) health care (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) messaging (3) ssb (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) social justice (2) reproductive justice (1) framing (14) healthy eating (1) white house (1) news coverage (1) Big Tobacco (3)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: